News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
Hanover, January 5--The challenge issued by Robert McPhail, quarterback on the football squad last fall, to E. J. Duffy, editor in chief of the Dartmouth for a debate on the question of "whether the Dartmouth should voice opinions obviously in conflict with those of the college at large", will be answered editorially tomorrow.
The answer states that "the question as it stands is meaningless, and there is no particular point in discussing it". The question is worded completely by the football star is, "that the Dartmouth is performing a function which is distasteful to the undergraduate body when it voices opinions obviously in conflict with that of the college at large, and should pursue a policy more in concurrence with the sentiment of the undergraduate body".
If McPhail is willing to discuss his original contention that the Dartmouth has no right to state opinions in conflict with those of the majority of the undergraduates, the editor in chief will meet him on any terms he proposes. The statement in dispute was first made by McPhail in an address before the Freshman class in which he deplored the opinion of Duffy as expressed in the Dartmouth in relation to the football situation.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.