News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
The speeches of Professor Scott Nearing and Mr. Clarence S. Darrow this afternoon offer Harvard men an opportunity which is unfortunately rather rare. Between indifference chiefly and mild opposition, radical opinions have little representation at the University. The suggestion that Professor Nearing and others should be invited to the Union platform caused heated dispute last year, to be settled finally by compromise; but the nominal admission of the value of open discussion means little. Men may admit that they only source of truth is the free clash of opposing views; yet it is only when conflicting theories are fairly heard and frequently discussed that education has begun.
In the classroom men constantly enjoy the best obtainable presentation of more conservative attitudes. It can only be a foolish fear of having a comfortable system upset that shrinks from hearing an able statement of radical views. The intellectual stimulation obtained from radical outside speakers can hardly be too frequent; and if there is little active official encouragement to their appearance, the more reason to seize the occasion when it is offered.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.