News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

WHY? PRAY, WHY?

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The new ruling of the Committee in Admission is obviously not as important as the Boston papers have made it appear to be. Apparently it affects only those candidates seeking admission under the Old Plan. With the New Plan and the first seventh arrangement in operation the sub-Freshmen coming in under the Old Plan are severely restricted in number. Yet why the committee should have adopted its present procedure not at all clear.

The ruling may, it is true, be aimed at the professional tutoring schools who stuff their subjects full during the summer and have them disgorge their knowledge at the September examinations. It is hardly fair, however, to punish the innocent alike with the guilty. To take away credit in three or four examinations because of failure in a fourth or fifth does not seem quite just. If this plan is adopted as a measure to further limitation of enrollment, a statement should be made to that effect. At present commentators are balked by its apparent unreasonableness.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags