News

Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search

News

First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni

News

Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend

News

Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library

News

Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty

WHY? PRAY, WHY?

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The new ruling of the Committee in Admission is obviously not as important as the Boston papers have made it appear to be. Apparently it affects only those candidates seeking admission under the Old Plan. With the New Plan and the first seventh arrangement in operation the sub-Freshmen coming in under the Old Plan are severely restricted in number. Yet why the committee should have adopted its present procedure not at all clear.

The ruling may, it is true, be aimed at the professional tutoring schools who stuff their subjects full during the summer and have them disgorge their knowledge at the September examinations. It is hardly fair, however, to punish the innocent alike with the guilty. To take away credit in three or four examinations because of failure in a fourth or fifth does not seem quite just. If this plan is adopted as a measure to further limitation of enrollment, a statement should be made to that effect. At present commentators are balked by its apparent unreasonableness.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags