News

Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department

News

Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins

News

Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff

News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided

News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

FRESHMAN DEBATERS LOSE TO YALE AND PRINCETON

Both Affirmative and Negative Teams Are Unsuccessful in Discussing Possibility of Revising Treaty of Versailles

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The Freshman debaters suffered a double defeat last Saturday night when Princeton gained a 2-1 decision over the 1926 Crimson team upholding the affirmative of the proposition "Resolved: That the United States should call together the powers signatory to the Versailles Treaty to consider revision of that Treaty", in Sanders Theatre, and when the Crimson team upholding the affirmative of the same question was unanimously defeated by Yale at New Haven. Although the decision of the judges favored Princeton, the Crimson speakers here gained the decision of the audience by a narrow margin.

The deciding factor in the winning of the debate for Princeton was probably the emphasis of the moral duty of America to interfere.

The 1926 men who spoke at New Haven were H. M. Davidson, A. D. Phillips, and P. G. Kirk. Their opponents of Yale were C. A. Moore, J. G. Becker, and J. A. Davenport. Those who spoke at Cambridge for the University were: H. M. Hart, F. S. Tupper, and J. W. Perkins, while J. R. McCullough, J. C. L. Waterman, and Barlow Henderson took the affirmative for Princeton.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags