News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
A movement is on foot to investigate the causes of the fundamental weakness of the track team with a view to making clear and, if possible, to eradicate the faults of the track system in the University. It is an obvious fact that during the past ten years at least the standing of track in the University has seriously declined. Since 1909 the team has not won a single intercollegiate track meet.
The great fault seems to lie in the lack of well-balanced teams. It has been the notable stars and point-winners who have kept up interest in track.
Cornell has won from the University for the past three years, while against Yale three out of the last four meets have been defeats. In the past decade but a single victory has been scored in the intercollegiates. The following record of track during the past ten years shows a general decline: Meets With Dartmouth. Intercollegiates. Summary. Dual meets: With Dartmouth, Harvard won 5, lost 1; with Cornell, Harvard won 1, lost 3; with Yale, Harvard won 4, lost 6. Intercollegiates: Harvard secured 1 first, 2 seconds, 2 fourths, 1 sixth, 3 sevenths and 1 eighth.
Intercollegiates. Summary. Dual meets: With Dartmouth, Harvard won 5, lost 1; with Cornell, Harvard won 1, lost 3; with Yale, Harvard won 4, lost 6. Intercollegiates: Harvard secured 1 first, 2 seconds, 2 fourths, 1 sixth, 3 sevenths and 1 eighth.
Summary.
Dual meets: With Dartmouth, Harvard won 5, lost 1; with Cornell, Harvard won 1, lost 3; with Yale, Harvard won 4, lost 6. Intercollegiates: Harvard secured 1 first, 2 seconds, 2 fourths, 1 sixth, 3 sevenths and 1 eighth.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.