News

Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department

News

From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization

News

People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS

News

FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain

News

8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports

A TEMPEST IN A NEWSPAPER TEAPOT

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The action of the Corporation in shifting the place of Mrs. Skeffington's speech of Tuesday evening from Emerson Hall to the Union has received some comment, more or less hysterical, from a few Boston newspapers.

It has been the traditional and iron-clad policy of the Corporation to allow no propagandist to speak in a College building. Mrs. Skeffington is considered a propagandist. In accordance with a rule established some years before she came to this country, a rule established entirely independent of Ireland or England or the war, the place of her address was shifted to the Union. The latter is the customary meeting place of the University, where all opinions may be voiced unofficially.

The action of the Corporation had no allusion to Mrs. Skeffington. Her address suffered, if it suffered at all, from a ruling which would apply equally to an Anglophile as to an Anglophobe address. Mrs. Skeffington's reception was proof enough of the rigid impartiality of Harvard's intellectual interests.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags