News

After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard

News

‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin

News

He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.

News

Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents

News

DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy

SOPHOMORE ARGUMENTS WIN

DECISION OF JUDGES AGAINST DEBATING TEAM OF SENIORS UNANIMOUS.

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The Sophomore debating team defeated the Seniors in the finals of the interclass debate last night in the New Lecture Hall. The Sophomores upheld the affirmative of the question "Resolved: That capital punishment should be abolished in the United States," while the Seniors defended the negative.

G. W. Wasser, E. C. Davison and A. E. Whittemore, composed the Sophomore team. The Senior team was made up of F. T. Smith, R. J. White and B. Woronoff.

The Seniors claimed that capital punishment is better fitted for protecting society from the criminal than life imprisonment because of the fact that a man's life is his dearest possession, and that he would consider well before jeopardizing it. The Sophomores based their argument on the statement that capital punishment does not protect society, for a jury naturally hesitates to condemn a man to death, so that a very small percentage of those actually guilty of murder ever receive the death sentence.

Dean H. A. Yeomans '00, Professor I. L. Winter '86 and Judge A. P. Stone '93 were the judges of the debate. Their decision was unanimously in favor of the affirmative

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags