News
Harvard Grad Union Agrees To Bargain Without Ground Rules
News
Harvard Chabad Petitions to Change City Zoning Laws
News
Kestenbaum Files Opposition to Harvard’s Request for Documents
News
Harvard Agrees to a 1-Year $6 Million PILOT Agreement With the City of Cambridge
News
HUA Election Will Feature No Referenda or Survey Questions
Considerable criticism has been made regarding the scarcity of seats for the Princeton hockey game last Saturday night. This criticism is based on the fact that a large number of the best seats were sold to speculators and ticket agencies, who resold them for the usual extra charge of fifty cents. It seems that this is hardly fair to the large number of Harvard and Princeton men who wanted to see that game, many of whom found it hard to pay even the regular price. Furthermore, the Princeton management had great difficulty in actually securing the disposal of one section which they had definitely engaged, because it was sold by mistake to a speculating agency. The Arena management may, of course, sell its tickets to whomsoever it chooses, but the criticism in this case is well merited, since every ticket for Saturday's game could easily have been disposed of in advance, at the regular price, and for the "personal use" of the purchaser. Is there need of the introduction of recent "world-series" ticket difficulties into amateur hockey?
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.