Communication.

We invite all men in the University to submit communications on subjects of timely interest. The CRIMSON is not, however, responsible for the sentiments expressed in such communications as may be printed.

To the Editors of the CRIMSON:

In your issue of Friday last you reported a meeting of the "third year class" of the Law School which took action in the matter of granting a doctor's degree instead of the present LL.B., and you quoted editorially an editorial on the subject from the current number of the Law Review. So far as it yet appears the comment introducing that quotation, whether original or inspired, is not a true statement of fact. There is some question as to whether or not the quoted editorial "states the attitude which most members of the Law School hold in regard to the proposed change of degrees," --a question which the forth-coming petition is to answer. Undue weight must not be given to the sentiment of the meeting reported as of the third year class, for it was not such in fact. It was a meeting of those third year men--by on means a majority of the class--who favored or opposed the proposed change. The sentiment of that meeting cannot yet truly be called the attitude of the class, much less that of most members of the Law School. R. W. SAWYER, JR., 3L.