News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
At last night's meeting of the Cercle Francais, Mr. Ivring Babbitt briefly explained the Symbolistic School and M. Regnier's relation to it. He said that M. de Regnier, besides being under the necessity of speaking about himself in his lectures would be obliged to mention his relatives, M. de Heredia and M. Pierre Louis, who are prominent symbolistic writers.
In speaking of the symbolists, Mr. Babbitt stated that there are two kinds of symbolism, one of ideal of thought, introduced by Emerson, and the other of ideal of dreams, introduced by Rousseau and Chateaubriand and defined by Verlaine. The French symbolists or "decadents" belong to this latter class. They employ a very vague form of symbolism, endeavoring to make their verse musical, and paying little need to coherence. In this respect they are nearly akin to Wagner, the great symbolistic composer. The symbolists have trespassed against all rules of poetry, and for this reason are not recognized as good authors by the leading critics of the day. M. de Regnier is the only "decadent" who has really received recognition, and he has had an honor which none of his fellow symbolists have shared, namely, that of having his poetry printed in the "Revue des deux Mondes." He is the most conservative of symbolists, and is not blind to their defects.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.