News

Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department

News

From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization

News

People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS

News

FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain

News

8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports

Brief for the Negative.

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

W. R. Buckminster and C. F. Clarkson.

Best general references: 1. Memorial of the wool manufacturers of the U. S. (1892). 2. S. N. D. North in Bulletin of Wool Manufacturers, Dec., '93. 3. Minority report of the Ways and Means Committee.

I. The proposed change will destroy vested interests. (a) Wool growers could not sustain the reduction in price (minority report, pp. 47-50). (b) Reduction on woolens would be unjustly hard on manufacturers (Memorial, p. 16).

II. The proposed rates would aggravate the depressed condition of the country. (a) Mills would be delayed in resuming business. (b) Destruction in wool growing would cause panic in other industries.

III. The proposed advalorem duties on woolens would (1) lead to underval-

(Continued on third page).

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags