News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Brief for the Negative.

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

W. R. Buckminster and C. F. Clarkson.

Best general references: 1. Memorial of the wool manufacturers of the U. S. (1892). 2. S. N. D. North in Bulletin of Wool Manufacturers, Dec., '93. 3. Minority report of the Ways and Means Committee.

I. The proposed change will destroy vested interests. (a) Wool growers could not sustain the reduction in price (minority report, pp. 47-50). (b) Reduction on woolens would be unjustly hard on manufacturers (Memorial, p. 16).

II. The proposed rates would aggravate the depressed condition of the country. (a) Mills would be delayed in resuming business. (b) Destruction in wool growing would cause panic in other industries.

III. The proposed advalorem duties on woolens would (1) lead to underval-

(Continued on third page).

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags