News

After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard

News

‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin

News

He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.

News

Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents

News

DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy

Brief for the Negative.

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

W. R. Buckminster and C. F. Clarkson.

Best general references: 1. Memorial of the wool manufacturers of the U. S. (1892). 2. S. N. D. North in Bulletin of Wool Manufacturers, Dec., '93. 3. Minority report of the Ways and Means Committee.

I. The proposed change will destroy vested interests. (a) Wool growers could not sustain the reduction in price (minority report, pp. 47-50). (b) Reduction on woolens would be unjustly hard on manufacturers (Memorial, p. 16).

II. The proposed rates would aggravate the depressed condition of the country. (a) Mills would be delayed in resuming business. (b) Destruction in wool growing would cause panic in other industries.

III. The proposed advalorem duties on woolens would (1) lead to underval-

(Continued on third page).

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags