News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
Among the questions in the "Class Life" pamphlet sent to members of '91 was: "Do you favor the 'Three Years Course' proposed by the Faculty?" Many answers have come in to the secretary of the class, and although the returns are still incomplete, they may throw some light on the favor with which the Faculty's plan is regarded by the students. In the following table of statistics, the members of the class have been divided into groups according to their standing as regulars and specials, and their time of entering and leaving the class. The sentiment of the class as a whole appears to be just three to one against the change. Of those who have tried the experiment, eight are opposed,- one very emphatically, three are in favor, and one expresses only qualified approval. Only two in the whole class are strongly in favor of the plan, while twenty-two are strongly opposed. The greatest proportional strength of the supporters of the scheme comes from the temporary and special students, and from the men who entered the senior class from other colleges, the opinions there being ten to fourteen and seven to eleven, respectively.
The answers may be tabulated as follows:
Three year men, 2 1 7 1 2
Entered sophomore, 2 1 1 2
Entered junior, 1 1 4
Entered senior, 6 1 10 1
Temp. and special. 10 2 10 2 1
Regular members, 2 16 10 4 93 18 8
Totals, 2 37 13 8 126 22 11
Infavor, 52
Opposed, 156
Undecided, 11
Total, 219
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.