English VI.

Debate of April 17, 1894.Subject: "Resolved, That all executive duties in American cities should be concentrated in the hands of the mayor and that his appointments should not require confirmation."

Brief for the Affirmative.Albert Boyden and Avery Coonley.

Best general references: Gladden, Cent. Mar. '95.

I. City gov't as at present administered is unsatisfactory by reason of (a) Corruption, favoritism in appointments, etc. (b) Inefficiency, lack of unity among boards and their members.

II. These faults cannot be remedied under the present system. (a) Good men will not run. Ability does not receive due recognition. (b) Best citizens will not vote because from the long list of candidates (1) they are unable to choose intelligently and (2) their vote wild do little good.

III. The proposed change will remedy these faults. The increase in power, independence and responsibility of the mayor will give a good opportunity to able men and obviate the difficulties under I (a) and (b).

Brief for the Negative.E. R. Coffin and H. J. Hughes.

Best general references: Bryce, I, chap. 50; C. W. Eliot, Forum 12, p. 153; North Am. Rev. 153, p. 580.

I. The city not only has the functions of a business corporation, but also those of a political body. Hence on the analogy of state and national governments, the legislative and executive departments should be kept separate. And the legislature should have a check upon executive appointments.

II. Danger of the rejection of good nominations is not greater than that resulting from hasty or ill-advised appointments. Responsibility for such rejections falls upon the legislature.

III. By concentrating responsibilities in the office of mayor the evils of city government are not avoided. They will continue from the workings of state interference, the spoils system, and the apathy of citizens. Continuity of policy cannot be secured.

IV. The temptation and opportunity for corrupt rings to secure this office will be increased.

V. In special cases where the executive should be unhampered, commissions independent of the legislature may be appointed.