News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
EDITORS DAILY CRIMSON. - Again the injustice of the present marking system has been shown in a conspicuous manner. Natural History 5 is by no means a "snap course." It requires at least six hours a week laboratory work, besides a knowledge of the points taken up in the lectures. The majority of the members of the elective have done faithful and careful work in the course, yet the highest mark for the half-years work was 88, while a large number ranged between 65 and 75. When this is compared with a soft course like the Mineralogical half of Natural History 4, where a man does nothing until a few hours before the examination, and easily attains a mark of 90 to 100, it will readily be seen that under the present system, marks are very poor indices of industry or ability.
"HYDRA."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.