News

Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search

News

First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni

News

Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend

News

Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library

News

Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty

Harvard Union Debate.

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The Harvard Union held its second debate at Sever Hall last evening on the question, "Resolved, that the safety of the country calls for additional restrictions upon immigration." On the affirmative Messes. Chenowith '88, and Heseltine, '88, were the principal disputants against Messrs. Shoemaker, '89, and Proctor, '89, on the negative. After these gentlemen had finished, the debate was thrown open to the house and interesting discussions ensued. The vote taken was as follows: On the merits of the question, affirmative, 29; negative, 14; on the arguments of the principal disputants, affirmative, 21; negative, 45; and on the debate as a whole, affirmative, 17; negative, 26.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags