News
Penny Pritzker Says She Has ‘Absolutely No Idea’ How Trump Talks Will Conclude
News
Harvard Researchers Find Executive Function Tests May Be Culturally Biased
News
Researchers Release Report on People Enslaved by Harvard-Affiliated Vassall Family
News
Zusy Seeks First Full Term for Cambridge City Council
News
NYT Journalist Maggie Haberman Weighs In on Trump’s White House, Democratic Strategy at Harvard Talk
Broadcasting from station WNAC yesterday afternoon, two members of the Debating Council met representatives of the Edward Quinn Debating Society in an hour's discussion on the subject, "Resolved: That generous pensions be given by the federal government to the aged."
Defending the affirmative, Victor H. Kramer '35 and W. Tucker Dean '37 represented the Crimson; while John F. Carr '28 and Francis Casey argued for the negative.
The affirmative contended that the old age pension is a social problem, demanding immediate action. Continuing, they pointed out that the federal government is the only institution capable of handling such a vast undertaking.
On the other hand, the negative argued that such, a pension would be little more than a dole, which the government could not undertake at this time and which should not be handled nationally, but locally by the individual state.
The greatest objection to the pension, they concluded, is that it would become a political football, another vote getting proposition.
Yesterday's debate concluded a long series of debates held this term, many of which were broadcast. Activities, for the Spring will be strenuous, with tryouts for the Hawaiian and the Harvard-Yale-Princeton debates scheduled for the first evening after the Spring recess.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.